Princeton Seminary recently sent me a continuing education opportunity from their
Institute of Faith and Public Life. The chief discussion will be around what it means to "do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly" from within an integrated theological and ethical framework.
For that, they've made a lovely little banner. Have a look.
Notice anything? They've taken the
Micah 6:8 trifecta and given us examples of people they believe embody those virtues. They even color code them for us. Let's have a look.
Do Justice = Rev'd Martin Luther King, Jr. Okay...fair enough. MLK is one of my all-time favorite
Republicans. And social justice that seeks to alleviate suffering through addressing all the causes of poverty (rather than simply looking at the symptom - not much money) is a
worthwhile effort on the part of Christians that doesn't always get its proper attention from conservative-minded persons.
Love Mercy = Dr. Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Um...this is a strange call. It's not as though he worked to help out the Jews. While he
did seek to assassinate Adolf Hitler, I'd hardly equate that with mercy. (And if it is, then
just war theory and
ministries of compassion just got a whole lot more interesting.) And the Hebrew word
hesed here translated has strong overtones of COMMITMENT and LOYALTY. Again, not a virtue that first comes to mind for someone plotting the overthrow of his government and the military defeat of his own nation. (Granted, I think he was unflinchingly loyal to the historic church and his Confessing Church movement embodied that.)
Not only is Bonhoeffer not a notorious do-gooder, but do-gooding isn't even the point. What God requires is not doing good for good’s sake.
What God requires of his followers is that they be committed and love being committed to God. Which makes it all the more curious that, right next to him - but colored in a way that doesn't tie her to a specific virtue, is a very paragon of mercy to others and commitment to God in Blessed Theresa of Calcutta. This woman embodied mercy (humility, too...though the left would excoriate her as anti-justice because she rebuffed them for murdering our unborn). What is Princeton saying with this?
But this isn't the strangest appellation or slight, either.
Walk Humbly = Mohandas Gandhi, Esq. Okay...his simplicity of dress and lifestyle indicate an epitome of living for others. I'll grant that. Humility, though, is a hard virtue to peg on someone who overthrew British rule in his home country. Moses, who cast off Egypt's chains, was meek - but he wasn't particularly humble.
Moreover, sheer humility is
not what is in view in the Scriptures. Read it again: walk humbly with your God.
Your God is covenant language. And it's used in Micah's burden against the Israelite's idolatry. "You've fallen to idol worship, and it has produced a profound effect throughout your entire society!" he says.
Here's the problem. Gandhi was a committed Hindu. He'd read the Bible and knew a great deal about it, but kept to the faith of his forbears.
Let me ask you...have you ever been to a Hindu temple?
And that's just the
outside.
Hinduism is full of idolatry. And Ghandi was an idolater. He was concerned about the poor...I'll grant it. But he hated the Creator, and proved it with every act of devotion rendered to the idols. (We know where that worship ends up going...
to demons.)
Mohandas Ghandi is not humble in the biblical sense. He was an arrogant, prideful, self-glorifying idolator who shook his fist in the face of God every day of his rebellious demon-worshiping life.
Princeton has made some extremely bad decisions in how they've cast this seminar. (Which may or may not be helpful.)
If you're a regular supporter of theirs - either personally, or through giving within the PC(USA), I advise you to let them know what you think.